Inteligencija = entropija?

Otvaram novu temu s obzirom na zatvaranje postojece ali u novom formatu.



Iz prosle teme izolirao/izdvojio bi osnovnu problematiku na kojoj smo, cini mi se, zapeli. Za pocetak, prilazem studiju kao pozadinu za raspravu:



Model Suggests Link between Intelligence and Entropy

Quote:

Dynamical systems that maximize their future possibilities behave in surprisingly “intelligent” ways. The second law of thermodynamics—the one that says entropy can only increase—dictates that a complex system always evolves toward greater disorderliness in the way internal components arrange themselves. In Physical Review Letters, two researchers explore a mathematical extension of this principle that focuses not on the arrangements that the system can reach now, but on those that will become accessible in the future. They argue that simple mechanical systems that are postulated to follow this rule show features of “intelligence,” hinting at a connection between this most-human attribute and fundamental physical laws. Entropy measures the number of internal arrangements of a system that result in the same ******d appearance. Entropy rises because, for statistical reasons, a system evolves toward states that have many internal arrangements. A variety of previous research has provided “lots of hints that there’s some sort of association between intelligence and entropy maximization,” says Alex Wissner-Gross of Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). On the grandest scale, for example, theorists have argued that choosing possible universes that create the most entropy favors cosmological models that allow the emergence of intelligent observers .... Previously, computer scientists have used a version of causal entropy to guide algorithms that adapt to continually updated information. The new formulation is not meant to be a literal model of the development of intelligence, but it points toward a “general thermodynamic picture of what intelligent behavior is,” Wissner-Gross says. The paper provides an “intriguing new insight into the physics of intelligence,” agrees Max Tegmark of MIT, who was not involved in the work. “It’s impressive to see such sophisticated behavior spontaneously emerge from such a simple physical process.”

Zakljucak koji se, po meni, namece iz osnovnih postulata prirodnih znanosti je sljedeci:



Sva "inteligencija" koja postoji u svemiru (ljudska i neljudska) je obavezno proizvod rasta entropije. U suprotnome pricamo o uplivu "vansvemirske/bozanske energije" koja je obavila dio "kreacije" iliti drugim rijecima kreacionizam.



Ovaj tekst gore pokusava objasniti nacin na koji je "intelligencija" ugradjena u "pravila fizike". Drugim rijecima, povezati adaptivno ponasanje nizih organizacija materije i visih organizacija materije (ljude) kroz zajednicke principe tj. objasniti emergenciju inteligencije na apstraktnom nivou. Moja zatvorena tema pokusava slicno.



Pa ovim putem pozivam na raspravu oko validnosti i implikacija iza ideje iz kvotane studije.



Takodjer, da li se slazete s mojim tumacenjem osnovnih postulata prirodnih znanosti, da inteligencija mora biti proizvod entropije i time utkana u prirodu odvijanja fizickog medjudjelovanja?



Koje su sve implikacije tog zakljucka? Koja je alternativa za objasnjenje emergencije inteligencije?



Jedna od implikacija s kojom se bavila moja zatvorena tema je: evolucija = entropija = inteligencija.

Inteligencija = entropija?