AMD's Athlon 64 3400,louis vuitton outlet
Our customary synthetic memory benchmarks will start us off,michael kors handbags, and we can see how the A64 3400+'s single channel of DDR400 memory compares to the dual channel solutions so common nowadays.The results show a clear difference between the 3400+ and the dual channel solutions. These synthetic benchmark scores may not translate directly into real world performance,insanity workout dvd, but they may be a primary reason for the existence of the dual channel Athlon 64 FX.The only real difference between the Athlon 64 3400+ and the A64 FX 51 is the number of memory channels,ferragamo shoes, as Linpack demonstrates. The two processors perform identically until matrix sizes become large enough for main memory to matter. Note,tory burch handbags, though,birkin bags, how the A64 3400+'s on die memory controller allows it to achieve much higher throughput than the Athlon XP 3200+. In fact,red bottom heels, the 3400+ just barely falls behind the Pentium 4 3.2GHz,true religion, and then only at the largest matrix sizes.Memory latency is the 3400+'s real strength. The dual channel Athlon 64 FX requires registered DIMMs,polo ralph lauren outlet, and those add a cycle of latency to memory accesses. As a result,bottega veneta handbags, the 3400+ beats everything in our memory latency test. Notice,ralph lauren, especially,true religion jeans, the massive latency difference between the Athlon XP 3200+ and the Athlon 64 3400+,valentino outlet, which run at the same 2.2GHz clock speed. This is one of the main reasons why AMD is now able to run with the Pentium 4 so well. Let's dwell on this point with some 3D graphs.
lulu lemon and Wire Your Motherboard
chi flat iron Bag International announces developments in its co
true religion jeans outlet Airlines on pace for best on
Our customary synthetic memory benchmarks will start us off,michael kors handbags, and we can see how the A64 3400+'s single channel of DDR400 memory compares to the dual channel solutions so common nowadays.The results show a clear difference between the 3400+ and the dual channel solutions. These synthetic benchmark scores may not translate directly into real world performance,insanity workout dvd, but they may be a primary reason for the existence of the dual channel Athlon 64 FX.The only real difference between the Athlon 64 3400+ and the A64 FX 51 is the number of memory channels,ferragamo shoes, as Linpack demonstrates. The two processors perform identically until matrix sizes become large enough for main memory to matter. Note,tory burch handbags, though,birkin bags, how the A64 3400+'s on die memory controller allows it to achieve much higher throughput than the Athlon XP 3200+. In fact,red bottom heels, the 3400+ just barely falls behind the Pentium 4 3.2GHz,true religion, and then only at the largest matrix sizes.Memory latency is the 3400+'s real strength. The dual channel Athlon 64 FX requires registered DIMMs,polo ralph lauren outlet, and those add a cycle of latency to memory accesses. As a result,bottega veneta handbags, the 3400+ beats everything in our memory latency test. Notice,ralph lauren, especially,true religion jeans, the massive latency difference between the Athlon XP 3200+ and the Athlon 64 3400+,valentino outlet, which run at the same 2.2GHz clock speed. This is one of the main reasons why AMD is now able to run with the Pentium 4 so well. Let's dwell on this point with some 3D graphs.
lulu lemon and Wire Your Motherboard
chi flat iron Bag International announces developments in its co
true religion jeans outlet Airlines on pace for best on
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire